{"id":7523,"date":"2023-02-06T11:18:13","date_gmt":"2023-02-06T10:18:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/?p=7523"},"modified":"2023-03-01T15:39:33","modified_gmt":"2023-03-01T14:39:33","slug":"three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/","title":{"rendered":"Three complementary methods for monitoring wild birds: results of the PROSPOVERG project"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>The PROSPOVERG project came to an end, along with two years of close monitoring for the fauna of the Poyen forest, in Guadeloupe. The birds in particular were monitored using three different methods, with a triple objective: to better understand the biodiversity of this forest, to assess the effectiveness and complementarity of the different monitoring methods used, and to train students in these specific techniques.<\/strong><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Knowing the abundance of individuals of certain species or populations is important to define their conservation status, and to adapt management measures if necessary. Studying the demographic parameters of several species in a specific place is also useful to better understand their ecology: interactions (predation, competition), differences in lifestyle (diurnal vs nocturnal), sociability or preferences in terms of habitat.<\/p>\n<p>In the field, several techniques can be used. During the PROSPOVERG project, three monitoring methods were thus deployed to study birds, but also mammals in the dry forest of Poyen, in Guadeloupe: a capture-mark-recapture (CMR) technique, the set-up of camera traps, and the use of acoustic recorders.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_7527\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-7527\" class=\"wp-image-7527 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Bagues-300x175.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"175\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Bagues-300x175.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Bagues-768x447.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Bagues.jpg 820w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-7527\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Rings for different species of birds<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The first technique (CMR) consisted of installing nets to capture flying birds. Eight nets, each 24 meters long, were deployed once a month for two years, always in the same places. Each animal that was captured provided valuable information: species, size, weight, sex and stage of development. A ring was installed on birds legs, with a unique number on it to identify them upon subsequent captures.<\/p>\n<p>The other two methods are passive. Automatic devices were installed in the same areas as the nets, for four months. With camera traps, we obtained images of each animal that passed in front of them, as cameras automatically took pictures when detecting a movement. Acoustic recorders captured ambient sounds, including the songs of birds whose species were then identified. This time, the recording was programmed: every hour for 24 hours, the device turned on for 10 minutes.<\/p>\n<p>These three methods are illustrated <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/f0mFreDvxEI\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">in the following video<\/a> (French with subtitles), shot in the field, and explained by Christopher Cambrone, scientific coordinator of the project.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Projet PROSPOVERG : Suivi de la faune d&#039;une for\u00eat s\u00e8che de Guadeloupe\" width=\"680\" height=\"383\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/f0mFreDvxEI?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>After two years of monitoring, it is time to take a look at the results. The analysis of the data over the four months during which the three techniques were all deployed confirms their complementarity. Indeed, nets only capture birds in flight, while the cameras are installed 20 cm from the ground, and therefore only target animals using the lower stratum of the forest. Sound recorders, for their part, can lead to the identification of species that vocalize.<\/p>\n<p>Over the two years of monitoring, 27 species of birds were detected by the three methods. Among them, birds belonging to 18 different species were captured, and nearly 800 individuals were ringed. During the four months it was in place, the acoustic monitoring proved very effective and detected 26 species, while only 10 species of birds were photographed and as many species were captured during the same period.<\/p>\n<p>Among the species of interest, three endemic birds to the Lesser Antilles have been listed in the forest of Poyen, the Scaly-breasted thrasher (<em>Allenia fusca<\/em>), the plumbeous warbler (<em>Setophaga plumbea<\/em>) and the Lesser Antillean saltator (<em>Saltator albicollis<\/em>), as well as a species classified as endangered in Guadeloupe, the White-crowned Pigeon (<em>Patagioenas leucocephala<\/em>).<\/p>\n<p>The analyzes also assessed the abundance of these species and their distribution in the Poyen forest. Mammalian data were also collected using camera traps: mongooses, raccoons, dogs, cats and rats. These data were compared with those of birds to better understand the risks of predation, in particular by evaluating the spatio-temporal overlaps (i.e. the possibility that two species will be in the same place at the same time of the day). Mongooses, the only diurnal invasive alien mammal species, were particularly photographed, and therefore pose a significant risk to the avian fauna of this forest.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_7534\" style=\"width: 499px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-7534\" class=\"wp-image-7534 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Oiseaux_PROSPOVERG_EN_reduced-489x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"489\" height=\"1024\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Oiseaux_PROSPOVERG_EN_reduced-489x1024.jpg 489w, https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Oiseaux_PROSPOVERG_EN_reduced-143x300.jpg 143w, https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Oiseaux_PROSPOVERG_EN_reduced-768x1609.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Oiseaux_PROSPOVERG_EN_reduced-733x1536.jpg 733w, https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Oiseaux_PROSPOVERG_EN_reduced.jpg 907w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 489px) 100vw, 489px\" \/><p id=\"caption-attachment-7534\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">A total of 18 different bird species were captured in the nets during the 24 months of monitoring.<\/p><\/div>\n<p><em>\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The project started at the end of 2020 as part of a partnership between AMAZONA (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazona-guadeloupe.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">www.amazona-guadeloupe.com<\/a>), an association contributing to the study of Guadeloupe&#8217;s avifauna and the dissemination of knowledge, and Caribaea Initiative. It involved more than thirty people, and enabled the training of two master&#8217;s and two PhD students. Several ornithological field trips for the general public and for students have also been organized as part of this project.<\/p>\n<p><em>The PROSPOVERG project was funded by the Office Fran\u00e7ais de la Biodiversit\u00e9. We would also like to thank the Office National des For\u00eats, the R\u00e9serve Biologique Dirig\u00e9e du Nord Grande Terre and the Conseil D\u00e9partemental de Guadeloupe for allowing us to carry out the monitoring in the Poyen forest.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-7530 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Prospoverg_logos-1024x140.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"680\" height=\"93\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Prospoverg_logos-1024x140.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Prospoverg_logos-300x41.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Prospoverg_logos-768x105.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Prospoverg_logos-1536x210.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Prospoverg_logos-2048x280.jpg 2048w, https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/Prospoverg_logos-958x131.jpg 958w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 680px) 100vw, 680px\" \/><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The PROSPOVERG project came to an end, along with two years of close monitoring for the fauna of the Poyen forest, in Guadeloupe. The birds in particular were monitored using three different methods, with a triple objective: to better understand the biodiversity of this forest, to assess the effectiveness and complementarity of the different monitoring [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":34,"featured_media":7524,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[275],"class_list":["post-7523","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-prospoverg-2"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Three complementary methods for monitoring wild birds: results of the PROSPOVERG project - Caribaea Initiative<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Three complementary methods for monitoring wild birds: results of the PROSPOVERG project - Caribaea Initiative\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"The PROSPOVERG project came to an end, along with two years of close monitoring for the fauna of the Poyen forest, in Guadeloupe. The birds in particular were monitored using three different methods, with a triple objective: to better understand the biodiversity of this forest, to assess the effectiveness and complementarity of the different monitoring [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Caribaea Initiative\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-02-06T10:18:13+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-03-01T14:39:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/PROSPOVERG.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"756\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"409\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sophie Labaude\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sophie Labaude\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/\",\"name\":\"Three complementary methods for monitoring wild birds: results of the PROSPOVERG project - Caribaea Initiative\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/PROSPOVERG.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-02-06T10:18:13+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-03-01T14:39:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/0f7c6eb89c3e68b2b204e5465c21eb76\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/PROSPOVERG.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/PROSPOVERG.jpg\",\"width\":756,\"height\":409},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Accueil\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Three complementary methods for monitoring wild birds: results of the PROSPOVERG project\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/\",\"name\":\"Caribaea Initiative\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/0f7c6eb89c3e68b2b204e5465c21eb76\",\"name\":\"Sophie Labaude\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/author\/slabaude\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Three complementary methods for monitoring wild birds: results of the PROSPOVERG project - Caribaea Initiative","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Three complementary methods for monitoring wild birds: results of the PROSPOVERG project - Caribaea Initiative","og_description":"The PROSPOVERG project came to an end, along with two years of close monitoring for the fauna of the Poyen forest, in Guadeloupe. The birds in particular were monitored using three different methods, with a triple objective: to better understand the biodiversity of this forest, to assess the effectiveness and complementarity of the different monitoring [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/","og_site_name":"Caribaea Initiative","article_published_time":"2023-02-06T10:18:13+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-03-01T14:39:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":756,"height":409,"url":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/PROSPOVERG.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sophie Labaude","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sophie Labaude","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/","url":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/","name":"Three complementary methods for monitoring wild birds: results of the PROSPOVERG project - Caribaea Initiative","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/PROSPOVERG.jpg","datePublished":"2023-02-06T10:18:13+00:00","dateModified":"2023-03-01T14:39:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/0f7c6eb89c3e68b2b204e5465c21eb76"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/PROSPOVERG.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/PROSPOVERG.jpg","width":756,"height":409},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/three-complementary-methods-for-monitoring-wild-birds-results-of-the-prospoverg-project\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Accueil","item":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Three complementary methods for monitoring wild birds: results of the PROSPOVERG project"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/","name":"Caribaea Initiative","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/#\/schema\/person\/0f7c6eb89c3e68b2b204e5465c21eb76","name":"Sophie Labaude","url":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/author\/slabaude\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7523","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/34"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7523"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7523\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7547,"href":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7523\/revisions\/7547"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7524"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7523"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.caribaea.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}